In asking those questions she exposes the struggle between younger and older African Americans and Black British people, challenging the way we acknowledge racism.
This play is divided into three parts. Part one is a collage of scenes performed by a very strong ensemble of actors. Each episode, fragment, and intimate interaction is an evidence of how oppression is still so ingrained in us. Many of the scenes are actually confrontations. It seems to be universal that when combating a common enemy, most fighting happens between people on the same side.
The lines are sharply cut off, interjected, and the hammering repetition defines these characters' exasperations. This play barely talks explicitly, refusing to specify what the conversations are really about, encouraging active listening from the audience who must draw their own conclusions.
The stage and light design are admirably minimal, only using some chairs and the revolving stage, allowing for total focus on the text.
In Part Two the first white actor appears, representing the white middle-class male, interacting with a young black woman. His entitlement was hilarious, and his pain threshold pathetically low.
Part Three is short film documenting American and British Laws that dictated segregation from 1943 to 1956. It’s alarming how recent this “past” is and how forgotten it now feels.
Honouring the boldness of the play I will conclude by saying that it felt like a call for arms. Inflammable, unapologetic and to the point.